Home Understanding contemporary demographic and economic drivers of household mobility and their policy implications Back to search Share Report Land use and development Population Governance and planning Understanding contemporary demographic and economic drivers of household mobility and their policy implications Final Report No. 437 Date Published: 06 Mar 2025 Authors: Hoon Han Matthew Ng Laura Crommelin Glen Searle Brian Lee Parian Hoseini From the Inquiry: Inquiry into projecting Australia’s urban and regional futures: population dynamics, regional mobility and planning responses What this research is about This research looked at why people move between urban and regional Australia, and identified the social, economic, demographic and policy factors driving these population shifts. Why this research is important Understanding population movements between Australia's capital cities and regional areas is crucial for accurate population forecasting, planning, supporting regional growth and managing community changes. Key findings Apart from 2013, since 2007 more people have moved from capital cities than to them. The number of people moving to capital cities peaked in 2016. People aged 65 and over were more likely to leave cities, while those aged 16–25 were more likely to move to capital cities. People leaving cities had higher household wealth and income compared to those moving to cities. Since 2014, more people from top income groups have been moving out, a trend that began before the COVID-19 pandemic. Most people (about 70%) moving to capital cities rent privately. In contrast, more people leaving cities become homeowners. Around 38% of those moving from cities own or are paying off a home, compared to 23% of those moving to cities. Employment is a key reason people move to citiesThe top reasons for moving to cities were: employment (28%) personal reasons (25%) lifestyle (15%). Health was the least common reason (3%). The top reasons for moving from capital cities were: lifestyle (28%) personal reasons (25%) housing (21%) employment (20%). Employment was a reason to move for both groups, but with different motivations: 27% of city arrivals and 20% of city leavers moved to start a new job 11% of those moving to cities wanted to be closer to work. Other reasons for moving included housing, lifestyle, education and healthBoth groups shared a desire to: get their own place find a larger or better home. Those moving to cities had greater education motivations (12% vs 3%). Health was a low priority for both groups. Policies to attract regional migration can be improvedCurrent policies focus on attracting workforce sectors, particularly health workers and school educators. There are opportunities to: target industries supporting regional growth develop specific policies for population growth expand incentive schemes for sustainable regional development. Policy actions Address income differences between city and regional residentsPolicies need to: tackle income inequality between city and regional migrants prevent lower-income residents being priced out of growing regions support social and affordable housing in regional areas. Take state-specific approachesUnderstanding migration motivations can help states develop targeted policies. For example, Victoria might need to support regional university campuses due to high educational migration. Address regional housing and infrastructureStrategies should: increase housing diversity zone land for residential and employment uses in major towns ensure medium-density housing has supporting infrastructure provide open spaces. Improve regional growth through education opportunitiesImprove regional education by: expanding university campuses offering online and hybrid learning providing scholarships for regional students creating affordable student accommodation supporting higher education staff retention. Improve regional growth through employmentFocus on: expanding incentive schemes supporting industries necessary for high-value, sustainable regional growth (e.g. urban planning, construction and renewable energy) increasing skilled construction labour through immigration policies. Improve regional transport and amenities to better support residentsDevelop policies to: improve access to services enhance public transport in regional areas consider accessibility options for ageing populations. design This study reviewed data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics Census, the HILDA dataset and state and federal government incentive policies. Related reports May 2024 Improving small area population projections May 2024 House price dynamics and internal migration across Australia August 2024 Place-based drivers and effective management of population growth and change in regional Australia March 2025 Inquiry into projecting Australia’s urban and regional futures: population dynamics, regional mobility and planning responses FULL PUBLICATION RESEARCH SUMMARY ANNOUNCEMENT DOI: Published by: Australian Housing and Urban Institute Limited ISSN: 1834-7223 ISBN: 978-1-923325-03-6 Han, H., Ng, M., Crommelin, L., Searle, G., Lee, B. and Hoseini, P. (2025) Understanding contemporary demographic and economic drivers of household mobility and their policy implications, Final Report No. 437, Australian Housing and Urban Institute Limited, Melbourne, /research/finalreports/437, doi: 10.18408/ahuri7130201. RIS CITATION Han, Hoon Ng, Matthew Crommelin, Laura Searle, Glen Lee, Brian Hoseini, Parian
August 2024 Place-based drivers and effective management of population growth and change in regional Australia
March 2025 Inquiry into projecting Australia’s urban and regional futures: population dynamics, regional mobility and planning responses