Home Addressing concentrations of disadvantage: policy, practice and literature review Back to search Share Report Housing in urban policy Community and place Social and affordable housing Addressing concentrations of disadvantage: policy, practice and literature review Final Report No. 190 Date Published: 21 Jun 2012 Authors: Hal Pawson Gethin Davison Ilan Wiesel This report focuses on the role of housing policies and programs in meeting the challenges presented by spatial concentrations of disadvantage. Related reports Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Auburn case study report Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Logan Central/Logan City case study report Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Springvale case study report Spatial disadvantage: why is Australia different? Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Emerton/Mount Druitt case study report Housing markets and socio-spatial disadvantage: an Australian perspective Related reports July 2014 Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: analysing socio-economic diversity and housing market performance July 2015 Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: residential mobility, place attachment and social exclusion November 2014 Understanding the spatial impacts of direct and indirect government housing expenditure September 2014 Living with place disadvantage: community, practice and policy Full Publication Published by: Australian Housing and Urban Institute Limited ISSN: 1834-7223 ISBN: 978-1-922075-04-8 Citation: Pawson, H., Davison, G., and Wiesel, I. (2012) Addressing concentrations of disadvantage: policy, practice and literature review, Final Report No. 190, Australian Housing and Urban Institute Limited, Melbourne, /research/final-reports/190. RIS CITATION Pawson, Hal Davison, Gethin Wiesel, Ilan
July 2014 Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: analysing socio-economic diversity and housing market performance
July 2015 Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: residential mobility, place attachment and social exclusion
November 2014 Understanding the spatial impacts of direct and indirect government housing expenditure
