Home Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: residential mobility, place attachment and social exclusion Back to search Share Report Housing in urban policy Community and place Social and affordable housing Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: residential mobility, place attachment and social exclusion Final Report No. 243 Date Published: 15 Jul 2015 Authors: Hal Pawson Shanaka Herath This report focuses on the role of housing policies and programs in meeting the challenges presented by spatial concentrations of disadvantage. Related reports Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Auburn case study report Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Logan Central/Logan City case study report Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Springvale case study report Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Emerton/Mount Druitt case study report Addressing concentrations of disadvantage—Russell Island case study report Housing markets and socio-spatial disadvantage: an Australian perspective Spatial disadvantage: why is Australia different? Related reports July 2014 Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: analysing socio-economic diversity and housing market performance November 2014 Understanding the spatial impacts of direct and indirect government housing expenditure September 2014 Living with place disadvantage: community, practice and policy June 2012 Addressing concentrations of disadvantage: policy, practice and literature review Full Publication Published by: Australian Housing and Urban Institute Limited ISSN: 1834-7223 ISBN: 978-1-922075-93-2 Citation: Pawson, H., and Herath, S. (2015) Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: residential mobility, place attachment and social exclusion, Final Report No. 243, Australian Housing and Urban Institute Limited, Melbourne, /research/final-reports/243. RIS CITATION Pawson, Hal Herath, Shanaka
July 2014 Disadvantaged places in urban Australia: analysing socio-economic diversity and housing market performance
November 2014 Understanding the spatial impacts of direct and indirect government housing expenditure
